Princess Cruise Line Auditions

& Share jackals

All ' day after the earthquake on April 6 showed 250 deaths in Abruzzo, the share of a growing TG1 toast, thanks to which it will sell better than its publicity. But collections are to be returned to the victims of the earthquake.

One might say that has not seemed to Gianni Riotta true blood destruction and death, shock felt as far as Naples and Rome, and splashing on the share, from early morning. One third of the public sticks to TG1 and did not spring up in the evening. Human response in the viewer, which gives rise to a bestial, the journalist. In fact, the day after celebrating the TG1: thanks to the disaster, Susanna Petruni rejoices, the ratings are at record levels. In a very detailed minutes of the 13:30 edition (reported by Marco Travaglio citing Roberto Corradi ), The leader rattles off all the numbers that allow you to monetize advertising revenue in the still warm corpses.



This 'reflection of the Jackal' is not distinguished, of course, only Riotta. Bruno Vespa it gives his part a particularly repulsive, but picks up again making a teddy plush from the rubble, muttering that if they are similar in all of the earthquakes. Jackal in grand style, Vespa exhibits a sincere contempt for his less fortunate colleagues, not the media jackals, those who have come to steal the night in dilapidated houses, and do not hesitate to evoke with nostalgia shooting, rowing in the good times of the beam. At the same

'reflection' does not escape even the civilized Ferruccio De Bortoli , who cooked in a sauce liberal. In his persuasive speech for resettlement to the Courier-style obamesco, released yesterday on the Internet, the civilized praises her as to have exploited the catastrophe to boost sales of the newspaper and site visits. Directed in the act of amateur journalists to the network, with the intent to make friends and seduce even the best professionals Berlusconi era can only produce at its most obscene, to disgrace and trafficker seller deaths of others.

view of the network, they can not but respond with a question (in the same fund that Luther Blissett formulated 14 years ago):

By what right do you sell to advertisers the attention it faces, lives, the feelings, the city destroyed the people of Abruzzo perceived by the public? By what right, that is, sell something you do not, you do not have product to you? Since you are only intermediaries (the "media") produced an attention elsewhere and by others (in this case, a natural phenomenon and a population). So why the huge advertising revenue that accompanied the news of the earthquake, we do not share con le persone e con gli ambienti che hanno prodotto quei fatti in originale, prima che voi ne diffondeste delle copie fotografiche o audiovisive accompagnate da commenti?

Questa in fondo è la domanda vera che la rete pone. E cioè, più in generale: se la produzione è perfettamente sociale, perché il reddito è perfettamente privato? Forse, nella risposta a questa domanda sta anche un pezzetto della risposta alla crisi.