Tuesday, March 10, 2009

When Does Sciatica Start In Pregnancy

The master's voice

La misurazione del tempo di voce che i telegiornali concedono ai politici restituisce l'immagine di un'informazione faziosamente schierata a destra, soprattutto in casa Mediaset.

Un'informazione televisiva nettamente orientata a destra, con le tre reti Mediaset più a destra delle tre reti Rai, e con l'unica eccezione costituita dal Tg3. Sono i risultati di During a study of Reuben and Brian Knight (NBER 2009, taken from Puglisi 2009), which quantifies the orientation of the six newscasts based on speaking time for the politicians of the two sides. Order from the most left-handed than right-handed: TG3, TG1, TG2, TG5, Open Studio, TG4.

A diagram for each newscast (at right: B1 = TG5) is the speaking time given to the political majority (green) and the opposition (in red) in three periods: before 2001 ( center-left government) between 2001 and 2006 (center-right government) after 2006 (center-left government).
In all the news, except il Tg3 (=P3), il predominio vocale del governo in carica aumenta, se il governo è di destra, diminuisce se è di sinistra.

Nel meno squilibrato, il Tg1 (P1), il predominio del governo di destra è di un 70/30%, mentre quello del governo di sinistra è di un 65/35%. Nel caso del Tg5 (B1) e del Tg2 (P2), il governo di destra surclassa la voce dell'opposizione con un 70/30%, il governo di sinistra con un 60/40%. Nel caso poi del Tg4 (B3) e di Studio Aperto (B2), la destra ha una preponderanza di un 85/15% quando è al governo, e la mantiene anche quando va all'opposizione, con un 48/52% (B2) e con un 30/70% (B3). Solo sul Tg3 (P3), the dominance of the left voice in government (70/30%) is greater than the right (52/48%).

Tg3 is therefore the most partisan of TG5 and Tg2, but less than Studio Aperto and TG4. The TG4 is the most partisan of all, with an approximate difference between right-wing government (85%) and left-wing government (35%) amounted to approximately +50%. Below Studio Aperto (+40%), TG3 (-20%), TG2 and TG5 (+10%) and TG1 (+5%). Only the TG3, therefore, allows more time for the governments of left and right ones. Only on TG4 and Open Studio, allowing more time always the same political party, the right, which is the government or the opposition.







Sunday, March 1, 2009

Filing False Report With Cps

Obama ready for conflict, "class" Propaganda Techniques


In the video message at the end of February Obama announced his policy of redistribution of income and openly challenge the financial lobbies

The post Keeping Promises "Keep the promise", published yesterday on the White House blog is a true declaration of war on 5% of the richest Americans and their lobbying activities on behalf of the people's mandate "for change "received by the November election. Here's Obama's speech, followed by a translation of the central passage:



" I know that these decisions do not accord well with the special interests of lobbyists that have invested in an old way of doing business, and I know that , as we speak, they are organizing to fight. My message to them is this - Me, too. "

Today also Eugenio Scalfari Republic stresses on the scope of this passage:

" Obama has raised the bar of the objectives and, in addition to macroeconomic and structural reforms has included a social redistribution income than ever before. It 's the case that has blown its moorings behind addressing the clash with the wealthier classes, minority in number but a majority in the possession and control of wealth and social power. Not even Roosevelt had come to much and do not talk about Kennedy or even Clinton. This we are seeing is the first real turn left the United States of America. "

In the afternoon, the news has disappeared from the titles on the homepage of the Republic (including the publishing of its founder, though dated now), as well as those of the Courier and the Press. The Courier editorial Angelo Panebianco explains "the pericoli” che la classe dirigente italiana vede nel nuovo corso di Obama (pericoli non per le sue rendite, beninteso, ma “per la democrazia”).

Già all’indomani dell’investitura, a noi era risultato chiaro che Obama, finanziato ed eletto grazie alla partecipazione popolare organizzata in rete, non avrebbe tradito i suoi elettori tanto facilmente, e che il profilo moderato del suo governo era un modo per pararsi le spalle in vista di politiche più radicali.